Jump to content

Talk:Lonely Among Us

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLonely Among Us has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLonely Among Us is part of the Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 5, 2013Good article nomineeListed
August 10, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

This article was proposed for deletion December 2004. The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lonely Among Us.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lonely Among Us/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Glimmer721 (talk · contribs) 17:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC) I will review sometime this week. Glimmer721 talk 17:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • "originally aired on November 2, 1987" - either "originally airing" or "that originally aired" (without the comma before it)
  • Perhaps say, "as well as the second appearance of Colm Meaney, who would later play The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine character Miles O'Brien." Adds the significance.
  • Perhaps add more to the lead about the writing of the particular episode.
  • Are there really only 3 other actors aside from the regulars? Just checking.
  • "...sedates Worf and brings him to sickbay..." Is it just "sickbay" or "the sickbay"? I can't remember which was used more commonly.
  • "This episode was subsequently compared to "Journey to Babel" → "Lonely Among Us" was subsequently compared to "Journey to Babel...". Just to avoid confusion.
  • Changed as suggested.
  • "who had previously worked on shows such as V and The Six Million Dollar Man." Italicize the titles of the TV shows.
  • I'm not sure "rewatched" needs the hyphen.
  • I also made a few small grammatical changes elswhere.
  • This seems like a fansite. I'm not sure the sentence it sources is very relevant anyway; it seems like trivia. Ditto with ref #5.
  • I notice that in this article you've combined the home media releases to the reception section, which is different from the other season 1 articles you've done. I like this article's format better, but if you're aiming for a Good Topic in the future than you'll want to get them with all the same, whether the changes be made here or to the other articles.
  • Yeah, this was the format I'd been using for Enterprise and the Deep Space Nine ones - I thought it looked neater rather than the ones with a single line or two for a section. Once I get all the season 1 articles up to scratch I'll need to go back through the earlier ones and upgrade them to current formatting. I know I've used a couple of different formats for the reference sections, and I found the viewing figures only about half way through, so I need to go back through and add those to the other articles. Miyagawa (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm putting this on hold for 7 days while the above (minor) issues are addressed. Overall the article is good. I think I may have seen this episode, actually...the "dress uniforms" rings a bell! Weren't they basically wearing skirts? Glimmer721 talk 01:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review - yeah, they never could get those dress uniforms to look right. They admittedly weren't as bad as the miniskirts that they had some of the male crewmembers wear, although I think really only the dress uniforms introduced in Insurrection were OK. The rest were horrid. Miyagawa (talk) 17:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All right, I will pass now. Glimmer721 talk 20:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lonely Among Us. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]